Irish Critics Criticize Netflix’s House of Guinness as ‘Steampunk Mr Tayto’

ago 2 hours
Irish Critics Criticize Netflix’s House of Guinness as ‘Steampunk Mr Tayto’

Netflix’s new series, House of Guinness, has received a polarized response, especially among Irish critics. The drama, set in 1860s Dublin, is described as a blend of *Succession* and *Peaky Blinders*, featuring an impressive cast and lavish production values. Despite this, many Irish reviewers have expressed deep dissatisfaction with its portrayal of Ireland.

Critical Reception

The show has been praised by American and British critics. They commend its stylish storytelling and engaging performances. A review in The Guardian termed it “irresistible,” while the BBC noted that viewers would “happily gulp it down.” However, Irish critics have expressed strong objections to various aspects of the series.

  • Audience Approval: The show debuted with an 89% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
  • Stylish Production: High-quality cinematography and a strong soundtrack featuring Irish bands like Fontaines DC.
  • Cast: Features English actor James Norton in a leading role.

Irish Critics’ Concerns

Despite the accolades, Irish critics have criticized the series for its inaccuracies and insensitivity. The Irish Times pointed out a “rudimentary understanding of Ireland’s experiences of colonialism.” The depiction of characters and dialogue has drawn ire, with one review likening the lead character to a “steampunk Mr Tayto,” referencing a famous Irish crisp brand mascot.

The Irish Independent described the storytelling as “a shocker,” asserting that it relied too heavily on clichés. Critics claimed that the misuse of history within the narrative is hazardous, stating, “We don’t need any more of it.” The series is marketed as fiction inspired by true events, focusing on the brewing family’s legacy after a patriarch’s death in 1868.

Visual Representation

Visual elements such as costumes and lighting have been subject to harsh critique. Many reviewers lamented the portrayal of historical figures and settings as overly simplistic. Critics took issue with the depiction of revolutionaries, suggesting they resembled “feral leprechauns,” drawing mockery for its reliance on stereotypes.

  • Costume Design: Critics questioned the design choices, particularly in how Fenians were depicted.
  • Dialogue Quality: Multiple reviews mentioned the clunky and unconvincing dialogue throughout the series.

Actor Performances

While the overall reception has been mixed, actors’ performances, particularly James Norton’s, received some praise. His ability to capture the character’s essence, despite the critical backlash, has been noted positively, along with the overall visual appeal of the show.

Conclusion

House of Guinness illustrates the divergence between international and local perspectives on cultural representation. While the series finds a welcoming audience outside Ireland, it starkly highlights the concerns of local critics who feel misrepresented. As more viewers weigh in, the debate over its artistic portrayal of Irish history continues.