Macrons to Submit Scientific Evidence in U.S. Court to Prove Brigitte Macron Was Not Born a Man Amid Defamation Battle

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, are preparing to submit scientific evidence and photographic proof in a U.S. court as part of their high-profile defamation case. The legal fight stems from claims circulated by American conservative commentator Candace Owens, who alleged that Brigitte was born male under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, a rumor the Macrons say is entirely false and damaging.

Macrons File Defamation Lawsuit Over Brigitte Macron Rumors

The Macrons filed their defamation lawsuit in Delaware Superior Court in July 2025, accusing Owens of spreading false claims as part of what they describe as a “campaign of global humiliation.” The complaint lists 22 counts of defamation and seeks both compensatory and punitive damages. According to court filings, the French President and the First Lady argue that Owens’ allegations were designed to generate publicity, attract followers, and profit financially from the controversy.

The case has already drawn comparisons to previous high-profile defamation lawsuits in the U.S., where public figures must meet the strict “actual malice” standard to prove defamation. This means the Macrons must demonstrate that Owens either knew the allegations were false or recklessly disregarded the truth.

Scientific Evidence and Photographic Proof to Counter False Claims

To directly refute the transgender rumor, the Macrons plan to present both scientific evidence and photographic documentation in court. Their legal team has not publicly disclosed the exact nature of the scientific proof, but attorney Tom Clare confirmed it would include expert testimony “scientific in nature” to show conclusively that Owens’ allegations are false.

Photographic evidence will reportedly include family archives and images of Brigitte Macron during her pregnancies, providing visual confirmation of her personal history. These materials are intended to directly contradict claims that she was born a man and bolster the credibility of her public and private identity.

Brigitte Macron’s Personal Response and Emotional Toll

For Brigitte Macron, the spread of the conspiracy theory has been deeply distressing. She has described the false allegations as “incredibly upsetting,” noting the personal toll of seeing her family life and womanhood questioned on a global stage.

Despite the difficulty of exposing private aspects of her life to public scrutiny, Brigitte has remained committed to the legal process. Her attorney emphasized that she is determined to “set the record straight” even if it requires submitting sensitive evidence.

Previous Defamation Cases in France and International Legal Challenges

The controversy surrounding Brigitte Macron’s gender is not new. The French First Lady previously pursued defamation suits in France against individuals spreading similar rumors. While some cases resulted in initial victories, appeals courts overturned parts of the rulings citing freedom of expression concerns. The matter is now pending before France’s highest court.

The U.S. case introduces additional complexities. Owens has invoked the First Amendment, arguing her comments are protected free speech. Her legal team has also filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, questioning whether Delaware courts have proper jurisdiction over the matter.

What the Case Means for Reputation, Free Speech, and Defamation Law

The outcome of this lawsuit carries significant implications not only for the Macrons’ personal reputation but also for the broader battle against misinformation and conspiracy theories in the digital era. For the French First Lady, providing scientific and photographic evidence is about more than winning in court—it is about restoring dignity and combating falsehoods that have gone viral online.

At the same time, the case highlights the tension between free speech protections under U.S. law and the rights of public figures to protect their reputations from defamatory claims. If successful, the Macrons’ case could set an important precedent for international defamation disputes involving high-profile figures.

As the trial unfolds, global attention will focus on the unusual and highly personal step of submitting scientific evidence to prove Brigitte Macron was not born a man, a move that underscores the severity of the reputational harm caused by these persistent false claims.