Canadian County Teen with Leukemia Removed Over Medical Negligence Concerns
A significant incident has unfolded in Canadian County, where a 17-year-old boy with leukemia has been removed from his mother’s custody due to allegations of medical negligence. This action has sparked widespread concern among state lawmakers and advocacy groups.
Details of the Custody Removal
The boy, who has been in a battle against leukemia, was placed in the care of Oklahoma’s Department of Human Services (DHS) following a court order. His removal was prompted by complaints from extended family members regarding his medical treatment.
Public Outcry and Lawmaker Support
Numerous lawmakers have publicly protested the DHS’s decision. They assert that the boy should be returned to his mother, Dayna Mooney. Over the weekend, a group gathered outside OU Children’s Hospital in Oklahoma City to advocate for the family.
- Oklahoma gubernatorial candidate Jake Merrick labeled the family situation as one of wrongful imprisonment.
- Senator Shane Jett emphasized Dayna Mooney’s dedication as her son’s primary advocate since birth.
Concerns Over Medical Decisions
Lawmakers claim that the teen’s treatment plan, initially managed under a naturopathic doctor, was abruptly interrupted by DHS intervention. Since being taken into custody, the adolescent has received chemotherapy and blood transfusions that were not approved by his mother.
Claims of Government Overreach
Concerns regarding government overreach have been raised by various lawmakers. Senator Jett accused the DHS of financially benefiting from the child’s custody. He stated, “They get paid for every child they bring into custody, potentially prolonging their stay for financial gain.”
Emergency Hearing and Legal Accountability
An emergency custody hearing was convened for several hours but concluded without resolution. Currently, there is a gag order preventing the release of details from the proceedings.
- The boy remains outside his mother’s care despite ongoing medical procedures.
- The Mooney family’s attorney emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in the child protection system to ensure the rights of families are upheld.
Statement from DHS
In response to the events, DHS stated that their role is part of a broader child protection framework involving law enforcement and judicial entities. They clarified that they do not act independently in these matters.
This case highlights the complex interplay between medical treatment, family rights, and state intervention, raising important questions about accountability and the rights of parents in Oklahoma.
