Streeting Demands Apology Over NHS First-Cousin Marriage Advantages Claim

UK Health Secretary Demands Apology for Controversial NHS Website Post on First-Cousin Marriages

The UK Health Secretary has called for an official apology following a controversial article on the NHS England website that suggested potential benefits of first-cousin marriages. This statement comes despite the established knowledge regarding the increased risk of birth defects associated with such unions. The article, published on the Genomics Education Programme section of the NHS website, has since been removed.

Understanding the Risks of First-Cousin Marriages

The now-retracted NHS article acknowledged the risks linked to first-cousin marriages but also mentioned “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages” as potential benefits. However, significant research contradicts these claims, highlighting the health hazards associated with these relationships.

A notable study from the Born in Bradford initiative revealed alarming statistics regarding children born to first-cousin couples:

• Increased likelihood of speech and language difficulties.
• Lower chances of reaching key developmental milestones.
• A higher number of visits to general practitioners (GPs).

Furthermore, research indicates that, after accounting for various risk factors, the incidence of congenital anomalies in children of first-cousin marriages doubles, rising from 3% to 6%. These marriages are responsible for 30% of genetic disorders observed in the population.

Insights from the Born in Bradford Study

The extensive research conducted between 2007 and 2011 examined over 13,500 families, revealing that:

• 60% of couples from Pakistani heritage are related by blood, including first and second cousins.
• 37% of these unions are first-cousin marriages, starkly contrasting with less than 1% among white British couples.

Health Secretary’s Reaction and Call for Accountability

Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, expressed his astonishment during a recent interview on LBC radio, stating that he was taken aback to learn about the article through media coverage. He remarked, “What on earth is going on here, and what are they playing at?” He further criticized the presence of the guidance, emphasizing the urgent need for accountability.

Mr. Streeting stated, “The medical science and evidence is clear. First-cousin marriages are high risk and unsafe; we see the genetic defects and harm they can cause. That’s why that advice should never have been published.” When asked if he believed an apology was warranted, he affirmed, “Yeah, I do think that.”

This situation raises significant questions about the responsibilities of health organizations in providing accurate information and guidance to the public regarding genetic risks associated with marriage between relatives. The debate continues on how to effectively communicate these risks while respecting cultural practices.

The post Streeting Demands Apology Over NHS First-Cousin Marriage Advantages Claim appeared first on CDN3 - el-balad.com.